Los Angeles is a wonderful place to live. With the climate,
geography, glamour and amenities it's no wonder that people from all over the
world, from rich Chinese and other investors, to pro athletes who don't play
for LA teams, have been flocking here. But there are
downsides to living in paradise. Housing costs are incredibly high,
traffic congestion is ridiculous (it takes my co-worker about 2 hours each way
to commute a little over 20 miles), and people are forced to live long
distances from where they work. Interestingly, the three problems I
just mentioned have all been greatly acerbated by the "activist"
community. Typically we think of activists as being progressive and standing
up for the little guy. And in the case of NIMBY (not in my back yard)
activists, they think they are taking that path. But in the way the world
really works, they have created a world 180 degrees apart from what they
intend.
The latest act of NIMBYism was just chronicled in the newspaper,
where activists are pushing a ballot measure that would have the effect of
stopping high rise residential construction in Hollywood. The idea behind
the construction boom is to build high rise apartment buildings near transit
stops is to move people off the freeways and onto
public transit, to ease the housing shortage which makes rents and home prices
so high, and to generally revitalize the center part of the city. But the
activists want nothing of this, saying high rise residential construction will
destroy the character of their neighborhoods. Now
if there were just one group in NIMBYs in town there wouldn’t be a societal
problem. But there are NIMBYs all over
Los Angeles, creating what is referred to as high barriers to entry for the
development of new residential housing in Los Angeles. This NIMBY
created restriction on the supply of housing means a shortage of housing, high
prices, and long commutes for people who are relegated to moving into the
boondocks in search of affordable housing.
Indeed, the contrast between housing supply
and prices in places like Los Angeles and San Francisco, as opposed to parts of
the country, like Texas, where there are no restrictions or opposition to the
development of new housing stock, and developers are free to build new projects, is stark.
I remember being on vacation a few years ago and having breakfast at
Denny’s. I was talking to my waiter and
learned that he was originally from Los Angeles, but left because of the high cost of
housing. His next revelation floored
me. He had just bought a three bedroom
house with a pool. On his salary from
Denny’s. Of course there is a flip side
to living in a city where there is a plentiful housing supply. The value of your house will only keep up
with inflation, and generally not appreciate above that rate. In contrast my house in Los Angeles is worth
at least four times what I paid for it.
Oh wait. Thank you, NIMBYs. I love you.
No comments:
Post a Comment